Newsletters

The American Institute of CPAs in a March 31 letter to House of Representatives voiced its “strong support” for a series of tax administration bills passed in recent days.

The American Institute of CPAs in a March 31 letter to House of Representatives voiced its “strong support” for a series of tax administration bills passed in recent days.

The four bills highlighted in the letter include the Electronic Filing and Payment Fairness Act (H.R. 1152), the Internal Revenue Service Math and Taxpayer Help Act (H.R. 998), the Filing Relief for Natural Disasters Act (H.R. 517), and the Disaster Related Extension of Deadlines Act (H.R. 1491).

All four bills passed unanimously.

H.R. 1152 would apply the “mailbox” rule to electronically submitted tax returns and payments. Currently, a paper return or payment is counted as “received” based on the postmark of the envelope, but its electronic equivalent is counted as “received” when the electronic submission arrived or is reviewed. This bill would change all payment and tax form submissions to follow the mailbox rule, regardless of mode of delivery.

“The AICPA has previously recommended this change and thinks it would offer clarity and simplification to the payment and document submission process,” the organization said in the letter.

H.R. 998 “would require notices describing a mathematical or clerical error be made in plain language, and require the Treasury Secretary to provide additional procedures for requesting an abatement of a math or clerical adjustment, including by telephone or in person, among other provisions,” the letter states.

H.R. 517 would allow the IRS to grant federal tax relief once a state governor declares a state of emergency following a natural disaster, which is quicker than waiting for the federal government to declare a state of emergency as directed under current law, which could take weeks after the state disaster declaration. This bill “would also expand the mandatory federal filing extension under section 7508(d) from 60 days to 120 days, providing taxpayers with additional time to file tax returns following a disaster,” the letter notes, adding that increasing the period “would provide taxpayers and tax practitioners much needed relief, even before a disaster strikes.”

H.R. 1491 would extend deadlines for disaster victims to file for a tax refund or tax credit. The legislative solution “granting an automatic extension to the refund or credit lookback period would place taxpayers affected my major disasters on equal footing as taxpayers not impacted by major disasters and would afford greater clarity and certainty to taxpayers and tax practitioners regarding this lookback period,” AICPA said.

Also passed by the House was the National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act (H.R. 997) which, according to a summary of the bill on Congress.gov, “authorizes the National Taxpayer Advocate to appoint legal counsel within the Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) to report directly to the National Taxpayer Advocate. The bill also expands the authority of the National Taxpayer Advocate to take personnel actions with respect to local taxpayer advocates (located in each state) to include actions with respect to any employee of TAS.”

Finally, the House passed H.R. 1155, the Recovery of Stolen Checks Act, which would require the Treasury to establish procedures that would allow a taxpayer to elect to receive replacement funds electronically from a physical check that was lost or stolen.

All bills passed unanimously. The passed legislation mirrors some of the provisions included in a discussion draft legislation issued by the Senate Finance Committee in January 2025. A section-by-section summary of the Senate discussion draft legislation can be found here.

AICPA’s tax policy and advocacy comment letters for 2025 can be found here.

By Gregory Twachtman, Washington News Editor

The Tax Court ruled that the value claimed on a taxpayer’s return exceeded the value of a conversation easement by 7,694 percent. The taxpayer was a limited liability company, classified as a TEFRA partnership. The Tax Court used the comparable sales method, as backstopped by the price actually paid to acquire the property.

The Tax Court ruled that the value claimed on a taxpayer’s return exceeded the value of a conversation easement by 7,694 percent. The taxpayer was a limited liability company, classified as a TEFRA partnership. The Tax Court used the comparable sales method, as backstopped by the price actually paid to acquire the property.

The taxpayer was entitled to a charitable contribution deduction based on its fair market value. The easement was granted upon rural land in Alabama. The property was zoned A–1 Agricultural, which permitted agricultural and light residential use only. The property transaction at occurred at arm’s length between a willing seller and a willing buyer.

Rezoning

The taxpayer failed to establish that the highest and best use of the property before the granting of the easement was limestone mining. The taxpayer failed to prove that rezoning to permit mining use was reasonably probable.

Land Value

The taxpayer’s experts erroneously equated the value of raw land with the net present value of a hypothetical limestone business conducted on the land. It would not be profitable to pay the entire projected value of the business.

Penalty Imposed

The claimed value of the easement exceeded the correct value by 7,694 percent. Therefore, the taxpayer was liable for a 40 percent penalty for a gross valuation misstatement under Code Sec. 6662(h).

Ranch Springs, LLC, 164 TC No. 6, Dec. 62,636

State and local housing credit agencies that allocate low-income housing tax credits and states and other issuers of tax-exempt private activity bonds have been provided with a listing of the proper population figures to be used when calculating the 2025:

State and local housing credit agencies that allocate low-income housing tax credits and states and other issuers of tax-exempt private activity bonds have been provided with a listing of the proper population figures to be used when calculating the 2025:

• calendar-year population-based component of the state housing credit ceiling under Code Sec. 42(h)(3)(C)(ii);
• calendar-year private activity bond volume cap under Code Sec. 146; and
• exempt facility bond volume limit under Code Sec. 142(k)(5)

These figures are derived from the estimates of the resident populations of the 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, which were released by the Bureau of the Census on December 19, 2024. The figures for the insular areas of American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands and the U.S. Virgin Islands are the midyear population figures in the U.S. Census Bureau’s International Database.

Notice 2025-18

The value of assets of a qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) trust includible in a decedent's gross estate was not reduced by the amount of a settlement intended to compensate the decedent for undistributed income.

The value of assets of a qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) trust includible in a decedent's gross estate was not reduced by the amount of a settlement intended to compensate the decedent for undistributed income.

The trust property consisted of an interest in a family limited partnership (FLP), which held title to ten rental properties, and cash and marketable securities. To resolve a claim by the decedent's estate that the trustees failed to pay the decedent the full amount of income generated by the FLP, the trust and the decedent's children's trusts agreed to be jointly and severally liable for a settlement payment to her estate. The Tax Court found an estate tax deficiency, rejecting the estate's claim that the trust assets should be reduced by the settlement amount and alternatively, that the settlement claim was deductible from the gross estate as an administration expense (P. Kalikow Est., Dec. 62,167(M), TC Memo. 2023-21).

Trust Not Property of the Estate

The estate presented no support for the argument that the liability affected the fair market value of the trust assets on the decedent's date of death. The trust, according to the court, was a legal entity that was not itself an asset of the estate. Thus, a liability that belonged to the trust but had no impact on the value of the underlying assets did not change the value of the gross estate. Furthermore, the settlement did not burden the trust assets. A hypothetical purchaser of the FLP interest, the largest asset of the trust, would not assume the liability and, therefore, would not regard the liability as affecting the price. When the parties stipulated the value of the FLP interest, the estate was aware of the undistributed income claim. Consequently, the value of the assets included in the gross estate was not diminished by the amount of the undistributed income claim.

Claim Not an Estate Expense

The claim was owed to the estate by the trust to correct the trustees' failure to distribute income from the rental properties during the decedent's lifetime. As such, the claim was property included in the gross estate, not an expense of the estate. The court explained that even though the liability was owed by an entity that held assets included within the taxable estate, the claim itself was not an estate expense. The court did not address the estate's theoretical argument that the estate would be taxed twice on the underlying assets held in the trust and the amount of the settlement because the settlement was part of the decedent's residuary estate, which was distributed to a charity. As a result, the claim was not a deductible administration expense of the estate.

P.B. Kalikow, Est., CA-2

An individual was not entitled to deduct flowthrough loss from the forfeiture of his S Corporation’s portion of funds seized by the U.S. Marshals Service for public policy reasons. The taxpayer pleaded guilty to charges of bribery, fraud and money laundering. Subsequently, the U.S. Marshals Service seized money from several bank accounts held in the taxpayer’s name or his wholly owned corporation. 

An individual was not entitled to deduct flowthrough loss from the forfeiture of his S Corporation’s portion of funds seized by the U.S. Marshals Service for public policy reasons. The taxpayer pleaded guilty to charges of bribery, fraud and money laundering. Subsequently, the U.S. Marshals Service seized money from several bank accounts held in the taxpayer’s name or his wholly owned corporation. The S corporation claimed a loss deduction related to its portion of the asset seizures on its return and the taxpayer reported a corresponding passthrough loss on his return.

However, Courts have uniformly held that loss deductions for forfeitures in connection with a criminal conviction frustrate public policy by reducing the "sting" of the penalty. The taxpayer maintained that the public policy doctrine did not apply here, primarily because the S corporation was never indicted or charged with wrongdoing. However, even if the S corporation was entitled to claim a deduction for the asset seizures, the public policy doctrine barred the taxpayer from reporting his passthrough share. The public policy doctrine was not so rigid or formulaic that it may apply only when the convicted person himself hands over a fine or penalty.

Hampton, TC Memo. 2025-32, Dec. 62,642(M)

During the presidential campaign, then candidate Barack Obama promised to close international tax loopholes and crack down on offshore tax evasion. In May, President Obama unveiled sweeping measures to reform the nation's international tax rules. The president also proposed to overhaul the rules for holding funds in offshore accounts, repeal the last-in, first-out (LIFO) accounting rules, tax carried interest as ordinary income, and provide limited business tax relief. Details of the president's proposals were released by the Treasury Department in the "Green Book" (named for the color of its cover).

International taxation

A U.S. based company is generally allowed to defer U.S. taxation on its foreign source income until the earnings are repatriated. President Obama has proposed various measures to limit the ability of U.S. companies to take deductions for offshore expenses against U.S. income. According to the president, some companies abuse the deferral rules and his proposals will close loopholes.  Opponents counter that the deferral rules are necessary to ensure American competitiveness in the global economy.

The president also proposed t

• Require corporation status under check-the-box election for certain overseas "disregarded entities" established by U.S. businesses;
• Curb income shifting through intangible property transfers;
• Curb earnings-stripping by expatriated entities through interest deductions;
• Repeal the 80/20 company rules that shelter dividends as foreign-source income;
• Prevent withholding avoidance by foreign portfolio investors through equity swaps; and
• Modify the foreign tax credit rules for dual capacity taxpayers.

Many of the details of these international proposals, especially about how to calculate the amount of deferred deductions to match foreign expenses with deferred income, need to be fleshed out. The president's proposals serve as a blueprint for Congress to use when drafting legislation. Congress may approve all or some of the proposals or make significant changes to them.

Offshore accounts

The IRS is aware that some Americans fail to report all or part of their assets in foreign bank accounts. Estimates of unreported income reach as high as $100 billion. President Obama would strengthen the rules for reporting by Americans and disclosure by foreign banks. Individuals and banks that fail to follow the heightened rules would be subject to enhanced sanctions.

LIFO

Many businesses use LIFO to account for inventory. The last units of inventory purchased are generally treated as the first units sold. The president has proposed to repeal LIFO, which would raise more than $65 billion in revenue.

Carried interest

Under current law, carried interest (partnership profits interests allocable to the performance of services) is taxed as capital gains. President Obama is asking Congress to tax carried interest as ordinary income subject to self-employment tax. Similar measures have failed in Congress before but the need to raise revenue may convince lawmakers to change the tax treatment of carried interest this time.

Business incentives

President Obama has proposed about $70 billion in tax cuts for businesses. One of the most significant incentives would be a permanent research tax credit. A temporary tax break for qualified small business stock would also be extended and expanded.

The president also called on Congress to extend the carryback period for net operating losses (NOLs). Current law allows an extended period for NOLs but is limited to small businesses. President Obama did not specify to what extent he would extend the NOL carryback but is recommending that Congress set aside significant budget resources of over $60 billion between 2009 and 2010 to carry this off.

Additionally, the president has proposed extending a number of temporary business tax incentives. These include tax breaks for restaurants, incentives to produce biodiesel and renewable diesel fuels, and tax credits for investing in economically-challenged neighborhoods. Congress could tack-on more temporary incentives.

All of the president's proposals will be debated at length in Congress over the next several months. The White House is asking Congress to move quickly on international reform and other measures to boost federal revenues. Our office will keep you posted of developments. Please contact us if you have any questions.

Just over 100 days into his administration, President Barack Obama is releasing more details about his tax policies. The Treasury Department's recently published "Green Book" (which is called green for the color of its cover) describes the president's tax proposals. As expected, many of the proposals build on the president's campaign promises to cut taxes for middle-income individuals. Congress has already begun drafting legislation and debating the president's proposals, which could be enacted into law later this year.

Making Work Pay credit

The centerpiece of President Obama's individual tax incentives is the Making Work Pay credit. Many individuals are already receiving the benefit of this credit in their paychecks. The credit reaches $400 for single taxpayers and $800 for married couples filing joint returns if they fall below certain income limits. The credit, however, is temporary and will expire after 2010. President Obama is asking Congress to make the credit permanent but many in Congress worry that a permanent credit would be too expensive.

More middle-income Incentives

Several other incentives are also targeted to middle-income taxpayers. These include marriage penalty relief, a permanent American opportunity education tax credit and permanent extension of lower individual marginal income tax rates (except for the 36 and 39.6 percent rates).  The president has also proposed extending the state and local sales tax deduction, the higher education tuition deduction, the teacher's classroom expense deduction, the saver's credit, and the deduction for charitable contributions of IRA funds. These proposals enjoy significant support in Congress and are expected to pass.

President Obama did not propose extending several new tax breaks. These include the first-time homebuyer credit, which sunsets after December 1, 2009, and the deduction for state and local taxes paid on motor vehicles, which expires after December 31, 2009. The first-time homebuyer is popular in Congress and lawmakers may extend it one or two more years, especially if home sales remain slow.

Higher-income taxpayers

More controversial are the president's proposals for higher income individuals. As mentioned, the top two individual marginal income tax rates would revert to 36 and 39.6 percent after 2010. President Obama has also proposed reinstating and expanding limitations on itemized deductions for higher-income individuals along with reinstating the personal exemption phaseout for higher-income individuals.

The White House generally defines higher-income taxpayers as individuals with incomes above $200,000 and families with incomes above $250,000. It is unclear if these amounts refer to taxable income or adjusted gross income. More details are expected to be released when legislation is introduced in Congress.

Children

One of the most popular federal tax incentives is the child tax credit. The 2009 Recovery Act expanded the credit. President Obama has proposed making the enhanced child tax credit permanent.

The president has also recommended a permanent enhanced earned income tax credit (EITC). Under current law, more families are eligible for the EITC.  However, the president has proposed eliminating the advanced EITC, which provides the credit in advance through payroll.

Capital gains

Under current law, the maximum tax rate on qualified capital gains and dividends is 15 percent. Some taxpayers may be eligible for a zero percent rate. These rates are temporary and will expire after 2010. President Obama has asked Congress to extend the lower rates for middle-income taxpayers. However, higher income individuals would be taxed at 20 percent on qualified dividends and capital gains under the president's plan.

Health care

Congress has just started debating comprehensive health care reform. Lawmakers are looking for ways to fund health care reform. Under current law, the amount that an employer contributes to an employee's health coverage is generally excluded from the employee's taxable income. One idea being floated in Congress is to cap the tax exclusion for employment-based health care coverage.  Administration officials have generally indicated their support for continuing the exclusion.

Retirement savings

During the campaign, then-candidate Obama often spoke about strengthening retirement savings, especially 401(k)s and similar defined contribution arrangements. The president has made one official proposal: mandatory automatic enrollment in IRAs. Generally, employers without a retirement plan would be required to offer automatic enrollment in an IRA to all employees on a payroll-deduction basis. White House officials have also discussed some "unofficial" proposals, such as the partial annuitization of 401(k)s, to strengthen retirement savings.

Estate tax

Eight years ago, Congress voted to repeal the federal estate tax for 2010. At that time, many observers predicted that repeal would be permanent. The recession has brought about different thinking. Instead of repealing the estate tax, the president has proposed extending the current rate of estate tax and exemption amount into 2010.

Congress has a lot of tax legislation on its agenda and is expected to enact much of it into law in late summer or early fall, maybe sooner. Our office will keep you posted of developments and please contact us if you have any questions.

Many businesses are foregoing salary increases this year because of the economic downturn. How does a business find and retain employees, as well as keep up morale, in the face of this reality? The combined use of fringe benefits and the tax law can help. Some attractive fringe benefits may be provided tax-free to employees and at little cost to employers.

De minimis fringe benefits

A de minimis fringe benefit is any property or service whose value is so small or minimal that accounting for it would be administratively impracticable. Such benefits are excluded from an employee's gross income. Examples of de minimis fringe benefits include:

Occasional overtime meals and meal money. To qualify as a tax-free de minimis fringe benefit, the meal or meal money must be provided to your employees so that they can extend their normal workday, thereby enabling them to work overtime. Such meals and meal money can only be provided occasionally. This means that they generally cannot be provided routinely, when overtime work is a common occurrence or are contractually mandated for overtime work. Occasional snacks may also qualify as a de minimis fringe benefit but if the snacks are provided daily, they would not qualify.

Occasional transportation. Transportation costs can also qualify as de minimis fringe benefits. Taxi-fare for an employee to return home after working late, for example, may be a de minimis fringe benefit. The transportation must be occasional.

Holiday gifts. Traditional holiday gifts, such as a Thanksgiving turkey, with a low fair market value can generally qualify as a de minimis fringe benefit. However, cash or a cash equivalent such as a gift certificate in lieu of the property, do not qualify. In fact, cash and cash equivalent fringe benefits, no matter how little, are never excludable as a de minimis fringe benefit, except for occasional meal money or transportation fare.

E-filing. Electronically filing an employee's tax return, but not paying for someone to prepare the return, may qualify as a de minimus fringe benefit.

Telephone calls. An employer may treat the cost of local telephone calls made by employees as a de minimis fringe benefit.

Working condition fringe benefits

A working condition fringe benefit is any type of property or service provided to your employees to the extent that the cost of such property or services would have been deductible by the employee as a trade or business expense, depreciation expenses, or as if the employee paid for the property/services himself or herself. Working condition fringe benefits have special tax rules for employers and employees.

Vehicles. If an employer-provided vehicle is used 100 percent for business and the use is substantiated, use of the vehicle is considered a working condition fringe benefit. The value of use of the vehicle is not included in the employee's wages. However, when an employer-provided vehicle is used by the employee for both personal and business purposes, an allocation between the two types must be made. The portion allocable to the employee's personal use is generally taxable to the employee as a fringe benefit. The portion allocable to business use is generally considered a working condition fringe benefit and is excludable from the employee's income. 

No additional cost services

If an employer-provided service does not cause the employer to incur any substantial additional costs, it may qualify as a "no additional cost service" and be excludible from the employee's income. The service must be offered to customers in the employer's ordinary course of business. Some of the most common examples are airline, rail and bus tickets and hotel and motel rooms provided at a reduced rate or at no cost to employees. This benefit can be offered to retired employees as well as active employees. There are special rules for highly-compensated employees.

If you are considering alternatives to salary compensation, and would like to know what your options are, please contact our office. We can discuss the tax benefits and drawbacks of providing your employees with various types of fringe benefits.

If you have completed your tax return and you owe more money than you can afford to pay in full, do not worry, you have many options. While it is in your best interest to pay off as much of your tax liability as you can, there are many payment options you can utilize to help pay off your outstanding debt to Uncle Sam. This article discusses a few of your payment options.

Pay Uncle Sam as much as you can

First and foremost, if you cannot pay the full amount of taxes due, you should nevertheless file your return by the April 15 deadline. Moreover, you should send in as much money as you can with your return. The IRS assesses failure-to-file penalties so you should file your return despite being unable to pay the full amount with the return. As such, it's to your benefit to file your return by its due date and pay off any outstanding balance as soon as you can in order to minimize interest and penalties.

Payment options

If you are not able to pay the full amount of tax you owe, you have options. While you can obtain an automatic six-month extension of time to file, the IRS will still assess interest on the outstanding unpaid tax liability. To do so, you must file Form 4868, Application for Automatic Extension of Time To File U.S. Income Tax Return, by the due date for filing your calendar year return (typically April 15) or fiscal year return. However, an extension of time to file is not an extension of the time to pay your taxes. Penalties and interest continue to accrue during the extension.

Second, consider paying some or all of your tax liability by credit card or obtaining a cash advance on your credit card. The interest rate your credit card or bank charges (plus applicable fees) may be lower than the total amount of interest and penalties imposed by the IRS under the Tax Code.

You may also be eligible to take advantage of the IRS's monthly installment agreement option. This option allows eligible taxpayers to pay off their tax bill over a period of time - in monthly installments - to the IRS. However, if you have entered into an installment agreement during the preceding 5 years you cannot use this option. Additionally, even while you are making payments through an installment agreement, penalties and interest continue on the unpaid portion of that debt. To request an installment plan, you can use Form 9465, Request For Installment Agreement. Or, you can use the Online Payment Agreement (OPA) application.

There are many options for paying off your tax debt. Our office can discuss the payment options that will work best in your specific circumstances. Please don't hesitate to call our office with questions.

The term "luxury auto" for federal tax purposes is somewhat of a misnomer. The IRS's definition of "luxury auto" is likely not the same as your definition.

The IRS limits the amount of depreciation that may be claimed on a passenger automobile used for business. These limits are popularly referred to as the "luxury car rules." Taxpayers who use the IRS standard business mileage rate (which is 55 cents-per-mile in 2009) do not have to worry about the depreciation allowance because the cents-per-mile rate includes depreciation.

MACRS

Taxpayers who choose to take a depreciation deduction for their vehicles start with the regular depreciation tables under the Modified Adjusted Cost Recovery System (MACRS). The vehicle must be used 50 percent or more for business purposes. The cost of a vehicle is depreciated over six years. In Year 1, 20 percent is depreciable; 32 percent in Year 2; 19.2 percent in Year 3; 11.52 percent in Years 4 and 5; and 5.76 percent in Year 6.

Dollar limits

Under Code Sec. 280F, annual dollar limits apply to "luxury autos." The applicable set of annual dollar amount limits depends on the date on which the vehicle is placed in service. The dollar limits are adjusted for inflation annually.

The annual maximum depreciation amounts for passenger automobiles first placed in service in calendar year 2009 are:

• • $2,960 for the first tax year;
  • $4,800 for the second tax year;
  • $2,850 for the third tax year; and
  • $1,775 for each tax year thereafter.

Bonus depreciation

In 2008, Congress authorized bonus depreciation as part of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008. Fifty percent bonus depreciation applied in 2008 to vehicles unless the taxpayer elected out of it. This resulted in higher dollar limits ($8,000 if bonus depreciation was claimed for a qualifying vehicle placed in service in 2008, for a maximum first-year depreciation of no more than $10,960 for autos). Congress may extend bonus depreciation into 2009.

If you are finally ready to part with those old gold coins, baseball cards, artwork, or jewelry your grandmother gave you, and want to sell the item, you may be wondering what the tax consequences will be on the disposition of the item (or items). This article explains some of the basic tax consequences of the sale of a collectible, such as that antique vase or gold coin collection.

If you are finally ready to part with those old gold coins, baseball cards, artwork, or jewelry your grandmother gave you, and want to sell the item, you may be wondering what the tax consequences will be on the disposition of the item (or items). This article explains some of the basic tax consequences of the sale of a collectible, such as that antique vase or gold coin collection.

Collectibles

You must pay tax on any gain you realize from the sale of a collectible item (or the entire collection), such as a gold watch or other jewelry, antique coins, artwork, figurines, and even baseball cards. Capital gains on collectibles are taxed at a rate of 28 percent, rather than the regular long-term capital gains rate, currently at 15 percent (zero for those in the 10 or 15 percent income tax brackets). Gain on collectibles is reported on Schedule D of Form 1040. To calculate capital gains on the sale or other disposition you need to determine what your basis in the item is.

If you purchased the item, your basis is generally what you paid for the item as well as certain expenses related to the purchase. Fees related to the sale itself should also be included, such as a broker's or auctioneer's fee or an appraisal or authentication fee.

If you inherited the item, then your basis is the item's fair market value (FMV) at the time you inherited it. There are two principal methods for determining FMV: an appraisal, such as used for estate purposes, or valuing the item based on contemporaneous sales of comparable items. However, this can be tricky because the condition of a collectible item plays significantly into its value.

If the item was a gift, then your basis is the same as the basis of the person who gave you the item.

If you buy and sell collectibles on a regular basis, devote a substantial amount of time and effort to the activity and have developed a degree of skill in identifying profitable transactions, you may be engaged in a trade or business. In this case, you may be engaged in a trade or business in the eyes of the IRS, and therefore your stock of collectibles may be "inventory" and your profits taxable as ordinary income.

Precious metals

Gold and silver, like stamps and coins, are treated by the IRS as capital assets except when they are held for sale by a dealer. Any gain or loss from their sale or exchange is generally a capital gain or loss. If you are a dealer, the amount received from the sale is ordinary business income. However, metals like gold and silver are classified by the Internal Revenue Code as collectibles, and gain recognized from the sale of gold or silver held for more than one year - whether or not in the form of jewelry or sold simply for its market content - is taxed at the maximum rate of 28 percent.

For all sales of more than $600, an information return generally must be filed with the IRS.

In a period of declining stock prices, tax benefits may not be foremost in your mind. Nevertheless, you may be able to salvage some benefits from the drop in values. Not only can you reduce your taxable income, but you may be able to move out of unfavorable investments and shift your portfolio to investments that you are more comfortable with.

First, you should keep in mind that gain and loss on a sale of stock or mutual fund shares depends on the fair market value of the shares when sold or disposed of, compared to the cost basis of the stock. Your investments may have lost substantial value over recent periods. Nevertheless, if the stock's value when sold is higher than the basis, you still have a gain.

Example. You purchased X Corp stock in 2004, when it cost $5. At the end of 2007, the stock is worth $12. In November, 2008, you sell the stock when its value is $8 a share. Even though your investment has declined in value by 33 percent, you have a gain of $3 a share on the sale ($8 sales price less $5 cost).

The same tax-basis situation that may cause capital gain on the sale of shares that have dropped significantly in value over the past year also is causing many owners of mutual funds that have declined in value to be surprised with a capital gains distribution notice from their fund managers. If you own the mutual fund shares at the time of the capital gain distribution date, you must recognize the gain. Of course, that gain may be netted against your losses from stock or other capital asset sales.

If you realize a profit on a stock sale, the long-term capital gains tax is a maximum of 15 percent, while taxes on wages and other ordinary income can be taxed as high as 35 percent. For taxpayers in the 10 or 15 percent rate brackets, there is no capital gains tax. These reduced capital gains rates are scheduled to expire after 2010. Short-term capital gains (investments held for one year or less) are taxed at ordinary income rates up to 35 percent.

Capital losses can offset capital gains and ordinary income dollar for dollar. Capital gains can be offset in full, whether short-term or long-term. Ordinary income can be offset up to $3,000. If net capital losses (capital losses minus capital gains) exceed $3,000, the excess can be carried forward without limit and can offset capital gains and $3,000 of ordinary income in each subsequent year.

Because a capital loss can offset income taxed at the 35 percent rate, it can be advantageous to sell stock that yields capital gains in one year, while delaying the realization of capital losses until the following year.

Example. Mary has two assets. One asset would yield a $6,000 long-term capital loss when sold. The other would yield a $6,000 long-term capital gain. If Mary sells both assets in the same year, she has a net capital gain of zero. If she realizes the gain in 2008 and the loss in 2009 (by selling the assets in different years), she will increase her 2008 taxes by a maximum of $900 ($6,000 X 15 percent), but will reduce her taxes in 2009 and 2010 by a maximum of $2,100 ($3,000 X 35 percent X 2 years). She will reduce her taxes by $1,200 merely by shifting the timing of the sales.

Worthless securities. You can write off the cost of totally worthless securities as a capital loss, but cannot take a deduction for securities that have lost most of their value from stock market fluctuations or other causes if you still own them and they still have a recognizable value. You do not have to sell, abandon or dispose of the security to take a worthless stock deduction, but worthlessness must be evidenced by an identifiable event. An event includes cessation of the corporation's business, commencement of liquidation, actual foreclosure and bankruptcy. Securities become worthless if the corporation becomes worthless, even if the corporation has not dissolved, liquidated or ceased doing business.

If you would like to discuss these issues, please contact our office. We can help you consider your options.